# SAC Spinner Electrical Repair - Advice Needed

## Recommended Posts

On 1/27/2020 at 2:31 PM, ChildOfCv said:

So, now that I've read the paper better, it appears that if the magnetic flux puts an N charge on one leg and an S charge on the other leg, it will work.  If the magnet puts the N/S charge to the sides of the reed switch, or vertically, then no dice.  I'll accept that.

The metals are ferrous, but are not magnets themselves. This means that bringing the magnet near induces a magnetic attraction between the two halves of the switch, and so they clamp together and conduct. You guys are overthinking it... just think "magnet near - closed. Magnet far - open."

At the voltage and current levels inside the SAC, there are not going to be very many restrictions on the device, as long as it's single pole.

##### Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Tursi said:

The metals are ferrous, but are not magnets themselves. This means that bringing the magnet near induces a magnetic attraction between the two halves of the switch, and so they clamp together and conduct. You guys are overthinking it... just think "magnet near - closed. Magnet far - open."

Nah, that's the thinking that led me down the eevil path to begin with.  The contacts have a long rectangular cross section, not a circular one.  They can be pulled in one axis, but not in the 90 degree rotated axis without breaking.  The magic that pulls them toward each other when the magnet gets close is that the magnet itself polarizes both contacts in opposite poles, so they are attracted to each other, not necessarily to the magnet.  Alternatively, you only need to polarize one contact, but with a much stronger magnetic field, as seen in the two graphs of closeness vs closed/open when parallel.  If the magnet is perpendicular and centered on the contacts, no amount of closeness will close the contacts.  You must move the magnet towards one leg or the other in order to induce magnetic polarity into one side only.

So in summary, if the magnetic poles are parallel to the contacts, be centered over the contacts.  If they're perpendicular, be off to one side or the other.

It's true that they aren't supposed to be permanent magnets themselves--that would hold their contacts together--but when the magnet comes close, it temporarily magnetizes one or both contacts.  It's possible that the perma-closed switch is that way because it's now a permanent magnet, and degaussing it would fix it.  But that's just speculation on my part.

##### Share on other sites

The Spinner was created in it's present form because of the expense of using an optical based solution.
Also when they designed the SAC Controller they wanted to avoid using batteries for the power supply like the other two controllers.

Paul Jaquays gave a speech with a Q&A stating that he was opposed to the controllers but at least the inventor got to do this...
While sliding his hand across the controller.

Personally I will say that the ADAM was one of the first home computers to have a working mouse.
It may be upside down but that is all a trackball is.
Not only that the SAC Controller 1 spinner is either Horizontal or Vertical while SAC Controller 2 is the opposite.

Paul Jaquays loves to put down the design but in one controller you get true 8 directional movement 16 buttons and a paddle.
Something unheard of at the time.

ADAM is a marvel of engineering and it is a crying shame that it gets so much smack.
The Commodore 64 without it's SID chip is junk and that garbage that came out of Atari could not compare.

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.