Jump to content
IGNORED

Star League Baseball XEGS cartridge.


Wilheim

Recommended Posts

<grumpy hat on>

 

As with the labels added from February to the other thread, I have to say I'm not impressed with the arbitrary text being placed at the bottom of labels and a better convention should be agreed and used by all.

 

1) State the publisher correctly. Taking the above example, its just misleading - historically what did Atari Crop. have to do with that release. According to AtariMania, this title is from Gamestar in 1983.

2) 'All rights reserved' - really? based on the time elapsed and possible change of ownership of these, can this be verified. (Best left of in my mind)

3) 'PROTOTYPE' / 'REPRO' - they are mostly neither of these. It could be a repro of a prototype (Blaster / Commando) or just a repro (Atari U.S.A's Ballblazer) but most of these are released/complete tape/disk titles converted to run from cartridge?

4) Stamping with an arbitrary 'RXnnnn' or 'CA' number - I can't see what purpose this serves? Who's maintaining them?

5) Random 'Printed in' locations - 'USA', 'U.S.A', 'UK', 'Taiwan', 'Hong Kong' - how's that determined? (Again, best left of in my mind)

 

Whilst I appreciate the idea of trying to match the format of the day, I'm seeing little effort going into reflecting the title on the cartridge.

So something like Nir's early labels would seem to suffice, e.g. 'Green Beret' - 'Copyright 1987 Imagine Software Limited' with maybe a second line of 'Cartridge conversion by Nir Dary 19xx'?

 

My other concern is now a new (readily available?) case is available and people have PCBs are we going to see a glut of these labelled versions available for sale? Bearing in mind the availability of multi-carts, titles like this are can be easily setup from an xex or atr and even made to autoboot to satisfy any need for an 'instant boot', so the 'benefit' of a standalone XEGS version seems beyond me but I accept each to their own and if they are made (freely available / for sale) customers will be there.

 

Has anyone else picked up on this?

 

</grumpy hat on>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wrathchild said:

<grumpy hat on>

 

As with the labels added from February to the other thread, I have to say I'm not impressed with the arbitrary text being placed at the bottom of labels and a better convention should be agreed and used by all.

 

1) State the publisher correctly. Taking the above example, its just misleading - historically what did Atari Crop. have to do with that release. According to AtariMania, this title is from Gamestar in 1983.

2) 'All rights reserved' - really? based on the time elapsed and possible change of ownership of these, can this be verified. (Best left of in my mind)

3) 'PROTOTYPE' / 'REPRO' - they are mostly neither of these. It could be a repro of a prototype (Blaster / Commando) or just a repro (Atari U.S.A's Ballblazer) but most of these are released/complete tape/disk titles converted to run from cartridge?

4) Stamping with an arbitrary 'RXnnnn' or 'CA' number - I can't see what purpose this serves? Who's maintaining them?

5) Random 'Printed in' locations - 'USA', 'U.S.A', 'UK', 'Taiwan', 'Hong Kong' - how's that determined? (Again, best left of in my mind)

 

Whilst I appreciate the idea of trying to match the format of the day, I'm seeing little effort going into reflecting the title on the cartridge.

So something like Nir's early labels would seem to suffice, e.g. 'Green Beret' - 'Copyright 1987 Imagine Software Limited' with maybe a second line of 'Cartridge conversion by Nir Dary 19xx'?

 

My other concern is now a new (readily available?) case is available and people have PCBs are we going to see a glut of these labelled versions available for sale? Bearing in mind the availability of multi-carts, titles like this are can be easily setup from an xex or atr and even made to autoboot to satisfy any need for an 'instant boot', so the 'benefit' of a standalone XEGS version seems beyond me but I accept each to their own and if they are made (freely available / for sale) customers will be there.

 

Has anyone else picked up on this?

 

</grumpy hat on>

 

IMHO, obviously an XEX or ATR loader can do the job easier for any user. As we many know, there are plenty of cartridge images applications that can be used to make multigame carts and there is also Ultimate Cartridge to make things even easier. But -who knows- maybe someone wants a direct cartridge conversion. It simply surged by a simple Facebook conversation with @Philsan about this game.

 

On the other hand, I agree it's not my strongest point at this moment to create labels. Surely more than one on this group can make this better than me. I'm just having fun on this.

 

Thanks for your feedback. I'll do my best to do the labels better next time.

 

Cheers!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considered the fact ATR and XEX versions of the game exist, at first I didn't think it was really necessary to make a ROM/CAR version of that game as proposed by Wilheim on Facebook (yesterday I posted a photo of my Star League Baseball game) because Multicarts like AVGCart, Side 2, Ultimate load XEX files.

But ROM/CAR files are loaded instantly, for example by AVGCart.
Therefore I changed my mind and I told him it was a good idea to do it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CAR over XEX loading time was only quicker because the latter was designed to be loaded from DOS and so loads as one block from $2500 to $8B7F and hence loses time relocating this down to $0500 and as a by-product has now made the title no-longer run on a 32K machine. But if the XEX is hacked to load direct to $500 then this works pretty instantly from any multicart because they are not using DOS but a custom XEX loader.

SLB_XEX-load_AtariMax.car Star League Baseball (low load).xex

Edited by Wrathchild
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

@Wilheim yes, a lot clearer. The hope is to spark some discussion of what realistically makes sense for producers to put on new labels

 

3 hours ago, Wally1 said:

 

Maybe Galahad and the Holy Grail is a possibility?

 

Same principle :) (with xex for those wanting it on a multicart)

Galahad and the Holy Grail XEGS.rom Galahad and the Holy Grail (1982)(APX)(US)[no intro - low load].xex

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Wrathchild said:

 

@Wilheim yes, a lot clearer. The hope is to spark some discussion of what realistically makes sense for producers to put on new labels

 

Same principle :) (with xex for those wanting it on a multicart)

Galahad and the Holy Grail XEGS.rom 64 kB · 4 downloads Galahad and the Holy Grail (1982)(APX)(US)[no intro - low load].xex 29.76 kB · 4 downloads

I agree. It’s always good to discuss the way we do things, and how can we improve it.

 

Thanks for the conversion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've tested Star League Baseball various versions with AVGCart:

Homesoft XEX: 2 seconds

Wilheim ROM: 1.8 seconds

Wilheim CAR: 1.8 seconds

Wrathchild SLB_XEX-load_AtariMax.car: 2.4 seconds

Wrathchild Star League Baseball (low load).xex: doesn't load and loads with Altirra

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As GatHG loads at $900 and SLB at $500 is presume the AVGCart bootstrap is running in that area and hence being trashed.

 

With the GatHG this seems to be an XL thing (maybe timing of screen flip) as OK on 800 settings so I'll do some checks to see where it needs XL patching as the XEX itself runs OK.

 

[Edit] Indeed, the game is zero for the PMBASE and so the missle area at $300 is being cleared and hence the TRIG3/GINTLK check thinks the cart has been pulled and so goes into the infinite loop.
[Edit2] Can be resolved by using the Switchable model and disabling the cart once the data is transferred.

 

Galahad and the Holy Grail SW-XEGS.rom Galahad and the Holy Grail SW-XEGS.car

Edited by Wrathchild
Added SW/XEGS cart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philsan said:

Wrathchild SLB_XEX-load_AtariMax.car: 2.4 seconds

This wouldn't be for loading via a multicart as it is an image for loading to an physical AtariMax cart.

 

The Homesoft XEX / Wilheim CAR difference seen would be because both need to be loaded from SD card into the cart's own memory and then the CAR is switched to which then simply copied 3 and a bit 8K blocks to RAM and then runs it.

With the XEX, a small loader is placed in RAM which then, in assistance with the multicart's firmware, typically transfers the XEX to its load address(es) 80 bytes at a time and so this would explain the 0.2s overhead.

 

The "Wrathchild Star League Baseball (low load).xex" I'd think should load in somewhere between the 1.8 and 2.0 seconds, so at a guess 1.9s due to not having to relocate the game code/data. I think the UNOCart loader is @ $700 so anticipate this wouldn't work with that either :( 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2020 at 9:47 PM, Wrathchild said:

As GatHG loads at $900 and SLB at $500 is presume the AVGCart bootstrap is running in that area and hence being trashed.

I have finally got around to fixing the Star League Baseball XEX by chopping 1K from the front so that it now loads at $900 and then once loaded it puts that 1K back at $500.

 

Therefore this will run OK on a 32K machine (and hopefully now from an UNO/AVG cart)

Star League Baseball (low load).xex

Edited by Wrathchild
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...